METHODS / 02

Extraordinary claims.
Ordinary traceability.

A public protocol for evidence, independent testing, transparent forecasts, corrections and conflicts of interest.

STANDARD 01

Source traceability

Identify origin, author or institution, publication date, exact document version, relevant conditions and primary source whenever possible. Distinguish first-party marketing from independent evaluation.

STANDARD 02

Evidence labels

Observed: directly documented. Measured: produced by a disclosed method. Interpreted: inference subject to challenge. Hypothesized: proposed but unconfirmed. Forecast: a dated, resolvable future proposition.

STANDARD 03

Forecast registration

Before resolution, record a unique ID, exact proposition, probability if quantitative, deadline, resolution source, baseline, known alternatives and publication timestamp. Archive updates rather than overwriting them.

STANDARD 04

Experimental accountability

Record model/tool versions, test data, evaluation scripts, environment, reviewer process, failure cases and whether the dataset could overlap training material.

STANDARD 05

Uncertainty disclosure

State sample and selection limits, evidence conflicts, confounders and measurement weaknesses. Avoid treating lack of evidence as proof of impossibility.

STANDARD 06

Corrections and independence

Readers may submit sourced challenges. Material changes receive a dated revision note. Editorial content does not confer endorsement; conflicts or sponsorship must be disclosed.

FORECAST REGISTER / INITIAL STATE

There are no scored forecasts in this launch edition.

Open research questions appear in the Futures Observatory, but they are not marketed as predictions. When forecasts are later added, their original publication record, changes and outcomes will remain visible.

See the observatory questions ↗